Technocracy is no way to go
Il Sole-24 Ore
Milan
Vlahovic
Governments of “experts” proposed in Italy and
Greece could be good at taking emergency decisions, but would deepen
European citizens’ diffidence towards ever more indirect democracy. To
avoid this, politics must reclaim its role.
The proposal – since withdrawn – by outgoing Greek Prime
Minister George Papandreou for a popular referendum on austerity
policies mandated by the European Central Bank definitively underlined
that the real problem regarding the rescue of the euro is far more
political than economic, and that the consensus of Europe’s citizenry
will be required sooner or later.
In Europe, referenda have unfortunately shown that the citizenship
of individual states are often reluctant to become European citizens.
Take Denmark in 1992, when the Maastricht Treaty was voted down; or
France and the Netherlands in 2005, which both rejected the draft of
the European Constitution. Also worth remembering was Ireland’s initial
2008 refusal of the Lisbon treaty.
The real political crisis today concerns models of indirect
democracy. They give citizens only the right to vote, while delegating
all decisions to elected politicians.
These elected officials, wherever
one turns, seem incapable of making decisions for the common good.
The State is the coldest of all monsters
Instead, they are the passive subjects of lobbyist pressure in a
heavy atmosphere of corruption and defend various vested interests in
such a way as to make both majority and minority unavailable to
indispensable mediation.
But when citizens feel that the tone of their lives and the premises
of personal freedom are being jeopardized by political shortcomings,
violent reactions emerge, which unsettle the functioning of states
themselves.
As a result, Nietzsche’s thinking makes its way to the forefront.
In his masterpiece, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, he wrote: “The State is
the coldest of all monsters. It lies coldly; from its mouth comes this
lie: I, the State, am the people.”
Moreover, according to Kelsen, only in direct democracies is the
social order actually created by the holders of political rights, who
exercise their will in popular assemblies that are held, as they once
were at the beginning of Athenian democracy, in the Agora.
This same principle helped inspire the Occupy Wall Street movement
as well as the nonviolent “Indignadosé movement the world over, focused
at the moment on Greece. In the scheme of things, this is the real
revenge of the Agora.
Even more serious is that fact that the ECB (or the International
Monetary Fund) are now dictating the rules and regulations of austerity
policies without ever having been conferred the sovereignty to do so.
This anomalous (technocratic?) control over the economies of member
states can yield three possible outcomes.
The Agora vendetta
The first, and by far the most troubling, is that a number of states
are forced to leave the eurozone, creating the kind of global
financial chaos that is feared, as President Barack Obama noted during
the G20 meetings, even by the United States, a country that for nearly
identical reasons finds itself in serious trouble.
The second consists, unimaginably, of a euro cut in two, with the
stronger half belonging to those states with more ordered economies,
such as Germany and northern European countries; and the weaker half
tied to the countries of southern Europe, at risk of default.
The third hypothesis would resolve all the current problems. It
calls for working to complete Europe’s original political design, as a
“free and united” entity, to paraphrase the Athens Manifesto. This in
fact was the intention of Europe’s founding fathers.
Reaching this goal means that blind financial-technocratic
governance, which so far has produced nothing but inequalities among
the citizens of individual member states, yields the playing field to
politics, which uses deliberated democracy to create a truly European
citizenry to which all people belong, based on the values of parity and
equality that I’ve already spoken of repeatedly.
This is the only solution that avoids “the Agora vendetta” and the
only one that abolishes the disparities among the citizens of member
states and that consolidates, in the context of a federal Europe, an
authoritative and non-dispersive presence.
Such a Europe, along with the United States, China, and emerging
nations, could sit down at a table and lay down new rules to fend off
and fight the disasters and anxieties that the process of globalization
has created.
Translated from the Italian by Christopher P. Winner
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario